Zimbabwe’s high court rules against chief justice’s term extension

0

Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa talks to the Chief Justice Luke Malaba during the swearing in ceremony of the country’s vice presidents at State House in Harare, Zimbabwe, on December 28, 2017. REUTERS/Philimon Bulawayo

Zimbabwe’s High Court dealt a blow to President Emmerson Mnangagwa on Saturday, ruling his decision to extend Chief Justice Luke Malaba’s tenure by five years was invalid because it breached the constitution.

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC), which employs all judges, said the decision means that Deputy Chief Justice Elizabeth Gwaunza becomes acting chief justice pending the outcome of an appeal.

The outcome is a setback to Mnangagwa whose ruling party also changed the constitution to allow him to appoint senior judges without going through a public vetting process.

The opposition has accused Mnangagwa of seeking to influence the judiciary, charges the president denies.

Lawyers had challenged a constitutional amendment that raised the retirement age of Constitutional and Supreme Court judges to 75 from 70, which allowed Mnangagwa to extend Malaba’s term of office by another five years.

The three High Court judges ruled that Malaba, who turned 70 on Saturday, had ceased being chief justice due to his age.

“In view of the decision that we have reached, Hon. Malaba ceased being a judge and chief justice” on May 15, the judges said in a ruling.

The court said the constitutional amendment should have gone to a referendum before becoming a valid law.

It also said that under Zimbabwe’s constitution, incumbent judges could not benefit from a term extension.

“It’s a judgement that protects the constitution,” said Tendai Biti, an opposition leader and lawyer who argued the case in court.

The JSC said it, as well as Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi, would appeal the court’s decision.

Mnangagwa’s spokesman George Charamba said in a Twitter post: “Enjoy while it lasts! We are fighters, trust us!”

Some legal experts say an appeal could lead to a conflict as the Supreme Court judges were also cited in the court challenge.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read More

You might also like
Leave A Reply

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More